Cradle-to-Cradle Recycling: The Next Frontier
Monday, 30 August 2010  |  Willow Lune | Article

Cradle to Cradle Book Cover photo by Zach TaylorImagining a closed system within which everything is reusable isn’t too difficult; it’s nature at its finest. What rises from the Earth takes an exact measurement of nutrients from the soil, water and sky, plays its part in the composition, then tumbles down and gives its materials back to the ground. Nothing is wasted, misplaced or abandoned. But transposing this sustainable cycle to modern commerce is another story.

The current means of industrial production, called cradle-to-grave, is another way of saying production-to-landfill, where litter also equals advertising (candy wrappers in gutters, plastic grocery bags on beaches et al.). This linear way of thinking cannot sustain itself indefinitely. Indeed, we have already begun to reap what we sow as US landfills are reaching capacity and closing at the rate of one per day.

Closed-Loop vs. Regular Recycling
So what about recycling? Isn’t it sustainable? Our current form of recycling is actually downcycling, where the process degrades the quality of material over time. One example is office paper becoming toilet paper. Recycling is better than nothing, but it only slows down a destructive process that eventually results in waste.

The concept of cradle-to-cradle, or closed-loop recycling, is different in that each part of the product is made with its entire life cycle in mind. Closed-loop recycling reduces the demand for raw materials and the fuel to produce a new product. Cradle-to-cradle materials are either biologically consumable, where they can be returned straight to the Earth, or technically reusable, where the materials can be reused or placed directly back into the production cycle. None of them are meant for the landfill—they are meant for repeated reuse.

European Leadership
If waste is the product of a poorly designed system, the numbers do not speak well for the US. The average European citizen throws away 1.4 pounds of solid waste per day, while the average American throws away more than three times as much: 4.4 pounds.
Within those numbers, more than 50% of waste in the US is packaging, whereas in the UK, for example, it is less than 33%.

Part of the reason for this difference is legislation passed in the European Union (EU) designed to hold manufacturers responsible for their products’ environmental impacts—through their entire life cycles. The Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR) Directive encourages producers, designers and manufacturers to conceptualize ecologically friendly products by phasing out harmful substances and using fully recyclable materials. The Waste Electrical and Electronic Equipment (WEEE) Directive mandates recovery and recycling for all electronic goods. End-of-Life Vehicle (ELV) legislation requires reducing vehicle waste to a maximum of 5% by 2015; today, ELV recycling is at about 75%, with 25% waste.

Non-European Successes
Today’s companies outside of Europe are catching on, too, recognizing that the closed-loop system has economic as well as environmental benefits. Hewlett-Packard employs the process with its ink cartridges, using old cartridge plastic to make new ones. In an effort to have none of its products end up in a landfill, Patagonia has instituted a generous repair program and takes back old clothing for recycling. Commercial carpet reclamation and recycling is carried out through the Shaw Contract Group, while Teijin, a Japanese fiber company, reclaims old polyester fabric and turns it into new yarn.

The cradle-to-cradle recycling movement is an indictment of our current trend of disposable products and extravagant packaging. It also calls into question our use of toxic materials that get downcycled or are not able to be recycled at all. Redesigning our production processes to follow the cradle-to-cradle recycling philosophy will inevitably create more eco-friendly and responsible goods, closing the loop and reproducing a system more closely tied to nature. Consumers will then be left with more than the choice between the lesser of two evils, as is often the case today. Instead, they will have the option of actually consuming in a sustainable and responsible manner. What a concept.

Additional resources:
The Story of Stuff

Cradle to Cradle: Remaking the Way We Make Things by McDonough and Braungart
‘Reduce, Reuse, Recycle'—and Stop Reversing the Order

Comments (1)add
Written by Jason Potts , August 30, 2010
Consumers should be careful to buy cradle-to-cradle products. Unfortunately, there aren't many and they aren't labeled. The government can help by requiring cradle-to-cradle labels on products and taxing non cradle-to-cradle ones. Then the eco-conscious consumer will have a label to result and the non eco-conscious consumer will be more likely to choose cradle-to-cradle products because they will be cheaper in relation to their counterparts thanks to the tax.
Report abuse

busy
 

Eco Tip

Become a vegetarian or vegan, or at least eat less meat. Meat is a big waster of water and energy—and generator of greenhouse gasses. It also exacerbates world hunger. One acre of land yields almost 18 times as much usable protein from plant versus animal sources—356 pounds if used to grow soybeans, 20 pounds if used to raise cattle for slaughter. More tips...

Eco Quote

Suburbia is where the developer bulldozes out the trees, then names the streets after them. — Bill Vaughn   More quotes...